More concise and considerate, the SMG football betting area has been completely revised and launched!

The new SMG football betting area has a simpler page layout, a better user experience, a more focused betting process and a more considerate novice service. Play SMG football, QQ gives you a unique choice.

The brand-new SMG football betting area, you don’t have to try it quickly, even Xiaobian can’t wait. Try it > >

The page is more concise and generous.

More concise and considerate, the SMG football betting area has been completely revised and launched!

The new version of SMG football betting area solves the problems of complicated pages and content accumulation in the old version, making the pages more concise and atmospheric.

The betting process is smoother.

More concise and considerate, the SMG football betting area has been completely revised and launched!

The page layout is changed from the original up-and-down layout to the left-and-right layout, and you can bet immediately after choosing the game, making the betting process smoother.

Novice tips are more considerate

More concise and considerate, the SMG football betting area has been completely revised and launched!

In order to help novice users understand, some tips on professional terms have been specially added, which reduces the betting obstacles.

In order to assist novice users to understand, some tips on technical terms have been specially added, which reduces the betting obstacles.

New experience of SMG football, heart feeling, look forward to your personal experience after a makeover!

The brand-new SMG football betting area, come and experience it now.

[Two-color ball prize pool 379 million lottery-Brazil A North Danjia Award 6%- 16 games tonight Lotto Football Lottery 116, 5 out of 11]

21+9+14! Dancsics cut three pairs in the air! Brother letter can lose without typing?

No matter who is the most handsome in this offseason, Jokic, who has just won three trophies, is absolutely well-deserved. He left everything in his hand and returned to his hometown to regain his old horse racing business.I don’t practice basketball and I don’t play games.

In Jokic’s mind, horse racing is definitely the main business. Compared with the mobile pork belly, he is more willing to enjoy the happiness brought by horse racing, according to the reporter."Jokic hasn’t touched basketball for almost two months."

Jokic’s behavior did not attract the complaints of netizens, who thought it was a holiday he deserved.Nuggets fans want Jokichi to rest more, and other fans want him to train less and his skills to drop a little.

For Mr. Yue, horse racing is the main theme of life. It’s hard enough to work for the Nuggets and contribute to the national team. Can’t the offseason pass? Do you want this meat?

Mr. Yue chose to put it in a bad place, and Dancsics next door chose the opposite path, adhering to the principle of winning glory for the country and never going off the fire line.Dong Zi is engaged in his great cause of losing weight, while working with his Slovenian teammates.

This is not the case. Two days ago, Dong Zi ushered in the first warm-up match before the start of the World Cup. Their opponents are no strangers. It isThe Greek team without the letter brother.

Everyone is expecting what kind of performance Dancsics can play after losing weight successfully. In this first warm-up match, Dongzi took the lead in showing us his first form.

In the NBA, he was given the code name."White Magician"A good passer, he can also deliver the ball to his teammates indiscriminately in the international arena.

In the game against Greece, Dancsics didn’t choose full firepower. He showed a strong desire to share the ball, and he hoped to draw his teammates into the game in advance.

The whole game,Dancsics sent as many as 14 assists.Everyone can see that he wants to help his teammates integrate into the team. Passing the ball is more attractive than personal data.

For Dancsics, it is obviously more difficult to score in national games than in NBA, and the difference in rules makes it more difficult to break through inside.

Of course, these are things that can be overcome. Compared with the breakthrough, Dancsics’s shooting is even more problematic, not to mention the three points that happened.9 out of 17 free throws.It is worth practicing more after the game.

The statistics are wrong, the actual rebound is reduced by one!

Although this is only a warm-up match for Dancsics and Slovenian, the outcome will not determine anything, but both the state of Dancsics and the state of the team need to be restored.

Dancsics scored 21 points, 9 rebounds and 14 assists in the whole game.In the case of comprehensive performance, theyDid not win in the hands of the Greek team without letters.

Dancsics’s success in slimming has really restored his speed in the competition, but he still feels unfamiliar after not standing on the field for four months.

He sent wonderful passes many times in the game, but the choice of shooting is open to question.People want to see Dong Zi, the killer in the international arena, instead of Luca, who just wants to pass the ball in troubled waters.

Whenever the world series comes, the topic that fans discuss the most is always"Which team will be the champion and which player will be the strongest scorer in this competition."

With Jokic and Brother Alphabet quitting this year, the pressure of scoring the World Cup falls on Dancsics and Markkanen. Everyone wants to see who is the real king of the competition.

Strange to say, Dancsics has never escaped the media’s choice and voting since he entered the league. His front foot has just become the candidate for the World Cup in the media’s mouth, and his back foot has caught up with the competition for the top five in the NBA.

Some media voted for the top five players in active service, and Mr. Yue and Brother Alphabet were impressively listed. As soon as this list came out, everyone had only one doubt."Where is Dancsics? Doesn’t he deserve to be selected? "

For such a result, Dancsics didn’t pay attention to it. Even if the reporter media sent the question to Dancsics’s mouth, he didn’t give a positive answer.

Even when the reporter asked whether he was satisfied with the status quo of the lone ranger, Dancsics chose not to talk about it. He said frankly."I am more concerned about the situation of the World Cup now, and I will discuss the lone ranger after the competition."

The failure of the European Championship and the 2023 season made Dancsics learn from the bitter experience. He started with losing weight and then became the leader of the national team.

This kind of Dancsics deserves people’s expectation. No matter the upcoming World Cup or the NBA in two months, everyone will want to see him healthy, thin and threatening.

Stackhouse: Ingram reminds me of myself, but I control the ball & I can’t play pick-and-roll like him.

Live on August 4th Recently, Jerry stackhouse, a former NBA player and coach of Vanderbilt University, talked about Ingram in Arenas’ program.

Compere: Does any of the active players remind you of yourself?

Stackhouse: It’s hard. The game has changed. It’s the players who attack the basket. Ingram’s right-hand breakthrough reminds me a little of myself, but I can’t control the ball and play pick-and-roll like him. He has a good view of the court, which I slowly began to have at the end of my career. He was born with that feeling. He has the rhythm of controlling the ball.

In 1995, stackhouse was selected by the Philadelphia 76ers with the third overall pick in the first round. During his 18-year career, he played for eight teams, averaging 16.9 points, 3.2 rebounds and 3.3 assists per game. When he first debuted from the NBA, stackhouse was once considered as Jordan’s successor because he graduated from the University of North Carolina, entered the NBA with the same draft as Jordan, and had similar offensive skills (basket-back singles, turn-over jump shots).

Three consecutive Premier League titles! Manchester City locks in the Premier League title ahead of schedule or is expected to achieve the triple crown.

On May 21st, Beijing time, Manchester City achieved three consecutive Premier League titles ahead of schedule due to the losing away game of rival Arsenal.

Manchester City Premier League three consecutive seasons: 2020/21, 2021/22, 2022/23.

In the 2022/23 season, that is, this season, Manchester City won the championship with a stable word. Before April, Manchester City had been suppressed by Arsenal in the Premier League standings, and it was in the second catching-up state. The team had to take care of the Champions League and the FA Cup at the same time, but they did not fall behind. At the critical stage of the championship competition, the team not only did not fall off the chain, but was close to the top of the list in a row. Due to the superposition of many factors such as the long-term injury of key personnel of the opponent Arsenal and the change of team mentality, Arsenal lost three consecutive victories in the championship competition stage, and was finally overtaken by Manchester City. In the final analysis, Manchester City’s championship this season is too strong. Instead of the embarrassment of Liverpool last season, the team won the championship 4-1 in the direct dialogue and regained the initiative. Due to Arsenal’s away defeat in the 37th round, Manchester City, which was four points ahead of the game, won the Premier League three times in advance. The team will play Chelsea at home on May 21st, and they will celebrate the three consecutive championships at home.

In the 2021/22 season, Manchester City’s rival for the championship this season was Liverpool, and the championship battle was not won until the final round. Interestingly, Steven Gerrard, a famous Liverpool player and then Aston Villa coach, once led the team ahead of Manchester City in the final round, and almost made contributions to the Red Army’s championship. Unfortunately, Manchester City scored three goals in three minutes, and Gundogan scored twice and Rodley made meritorious deeds, helping Manchester City, which was two goals behind, complete the reversal; Although Liverpool beat Wolves 3-1 at home, Manchester City won the Premier League title for the second time by one point.

In the 2020/21 season, Manchester City has a great advantage in winning the championship, with 86 points, 12 points higher than Manchester United, the second place.

In addition, Manchester City has reached the finals in the FA Cup and the Champions League, and it is expected to achieve the triple crown this season.

Clippers discuss trading Leonard’s injury can’t keep James Lakers Ballmer from spending 1.2 billion dollars in four years.

Los Angeles Times reporter Law Murray recently reported that Steve Ballmer was tired of Cowie Leonard’s repeated injury and load management scripts, and Clippers management planned to seek a deal between Leonard and Paul George in this offseason. This reconstruction option has been discussed internally.

The Clippers returned to Los Angeles with a big score of 1-1. Before the third game of the series, the whole team practiced shooting. Head coach Tyrone Lu was still optimistic. Former assistant coach Chauncey Billups was also present to help guide the training, and chatted with Westbrook on the sidelines to exchange some game suggestions. Later, George sent a positive message: "I’m training and I’m in very good shape. I’ll win the championship together when I come back."

Everything is going in an orderly way. Clippers fans are looking forward to beating the Suns at home and taking the trend of the series into their own hands. Soon, an injury news was released: "Leonard sprained his right knee and will miss the third game against the Suns." This is the 30th day of George’s right knee injury, and he expects to need the Clippers to reach the Western Conference semifinals before he can come back.

The Clippers’ situation is still deteriorating. Leonard’s knee injury has nothing to do with the ligament tear two years ago, but the injury position is on the same side of his right knee, which is worrying. "Leonard has no timetable for his return, and I don’t know when he will return from injury." Law Murray confirmed, "Clippers management, coaching staff and players still hold a glimmer of hope, expecting Leonard to come back at some point, but the situation does not seem optimistic."

"This is a familiar playoff story for the Clippers. There is no Leonard and no George." Law Murray revealed, "Ballmer is tired of such a plot, tired of Leonard’s endless injuries and load management, tired of entering the playoffs with hope year after year, and ending the season with great disappointment." Since 2020, something has happened to the Clippers every spring, which makes the management unable to achieve the plan of winning the championship. Every year, they come on the spur of the moment and come back disappointed.

In 2020, the Clippers reached the playoffs with the second place in the West and were reversed by the Nuggets with a 3-1 lead. In the semi-final of the Western Conference in 2021, Leonard’s right knee ligament was torn and reimbursed; In 2022, Leonard was reimbursed for the season, and George was also unable to play in the key game against the team; Then in the spring of 2023, Leonard and George stood by in front of the fans in Los Angeles. "(Leonard is always injured) This is really painful and particularly boring." Ballmer said in an interview, "This is the casino profit effect."

The Clippers signed Leonard with a maximum salary of $109 million for three years in 2019, and renewed his contract with a maximum salary of $176 million for four years in 2021. Ballmer not only invested $285 million in Leonard, but also traded his designated George from the Thunder at any cost. Every season, he built a lineup around Leonard and didn’t care about money. The Clippers ranked in the top three in the league in salary expenditure in the past four seasons, and ranked first in the total salary of $193 million this season.

"Ballmer is extremely eager to see the Clippers win the championship. He is eager for the Clippers to beat James and the Lakers in Los Angeles. Unfortunately, this wish may be difficult to achieve by Leonard." Law Murray continued, "Ballmer was extremely disappointed. This season was originally the best chance for the Clippers to win the championship, but the hope became extremely slim with Leonard and George’s knee injuries." During Leonard’s four seasons with the Clippers, Ballmer spent more than $1.2 billion on player salaries and luxury taxes, but he couldn’t realize his dream of winning the championship.

Leonard played only 161 games in the Clippers’ four seasons, of which he was reimbursed in 2021-22. He missed a lot of games in each season for load management, and still could not guarantee his health. "Clippers management and Ballmer discussed it, maybe it’s time to set sail again." Law Murray said, "In this offseason, the Clippers’ most important plan includes the option of trading Leonard and George, and rebuilding a healthy team to compete for the championship.

Leave a message to send points | Copyright of AI works

In the past two years, while AI painting has entered the public’s field of vision, it has also caused a lot of controversy.

In 2022, the AI painting "Space Opera" won the first place in the art competition at the Colorado Expo in the United States, which quickly aroused people’s attention to AI painting, which also triggered a series of discussions such as "Can AI participate in the competition" and "Can AI replace human painters".

AI painting is changing with each passing day and developing rapidly. While it is popular, it has been resisted by many artists because of the problem of "feeding pictures". At the end of last year, Artstation, a world-renowned art website, was screened by an icon boycotting AI works, and artists expressed their anger. At the beginning of this year, another artist filed a class action lawsuit against AI companies such as Stability AI, Midjourney and Deviant Art, claiming that AI companies violated the rights of millions of artists.

Controversy continues because legal progress has not kept pace with the development of science and technology, the current legal norms lack the identification of the ownership of artificial intelligence creations, and the copyright issue of AI paintings cannot be finalized. However, a recent letter from the US Copyright Office has aroused widespread concern.

Screenshot of letters from the US Copyright Office

In February this year, the US Copyright Office re-examined a work that was registered last year. This work is a comic book "Zarya of the Dawn" created by an artist named Kristina Kashtanova using the AI painting tool Midjourney. In a letter to Kristina Kashtanova’s attorney, the US Copyright Office made a new administrative decision: cancel the original copyright registration of Zarija at Dawn and re-register the comic book as a compilation. The reason is that Kristina used the AI tool to create the picture part of the cartoon, but she didn’t explain it when she first applied. The US Copyright Office thinks that this kind of AI painting is not a work created by a human author, and it is not within the scope of "works" protected by law, so it can’t be registered.

The cover and some illustrations of Zarija at Dawn

In the letter, the US Copyright Office emphasized that the protection scope of The Copyright Act is original works, and originality includes independent creativity and full creativity.

Kristina Kashtanova argued that she constantly revised the prompt to achieve the final desired result, and that she also PS-processed the generated pictures. In this regard, the US Copyright Office responded: constantly improving the picture by modifying the prompt is not creation. Kristina Kashtanova’s prompt expression is very short, and the main creative process is completed by AI. What she does is selection rather than creation. In addition, she did too little PS processing on the picture to be considered as creation.

In addition, the Copyright Administration also pointed out that people can’t predict the specific output results of the Midjourney tool. This lack of "creative control" and "dominance" proves that the descriptions and instructions that Kristina Kashtanova only inputs in the AI tool are only "suggestions", and the final generated pictures are still in the final decision of AI, so the works do not contain human creativity and are not "original", which further proves that the Midjourney in this incident is.

If the "uncontrollable" problem emphasized by the US Copyright Office is solved, will the works generated by AI paintings be copyrightable?For example, the ControlNet model of the recent fire has realized the precise control of AI generation to some extent through various image analysis methods such as attitude recognition Openpose, Depth detection and edge detection Canny.

In this regard, we specially consulted Xiao Sa, a senior partner of Beijing Dacheng Law Firm. She explained: "The uncontrollable generation of pictures is one of the reasons and basis for the US Copyright Office to determine that AI works are not original, but precise control is not the essence of the copyright of AI works.The key to whether the product of ControlNet is copyrightable lies in whether it can embody the "originality" of human beings sufficiently and clearly.

If it can be proved that the works generated by AI are original, will they be protected by copyright?

Lawyer Xiao Sa: "It will be protected by copyright. The court of our country has made such a judgment-a Goose Factory Computer System Co., Ltd. v. a company in Shanghai for a dispute over copyright ownership. Tencent developed an AI software called Dreamwriter, which can automatically generate news articles according to the latest situation of the stock market. The defendant reprinted the article without permission, causing disputes. In the judgment, Shenzhen Nanshan Court held that the AI article involved was a work in the sense of Copyright Law: "The creation of the work reflects the originality of a goose factory team in data input, triggering specific conditions, language style selection, etc., and it is copyrightable and should be protected by copyright law."

If the work generated by AI cannot be proved to be original, can the author not enjoy the rights to the work?

If we can’t prove that the AI work is original enough (or the administrative organ doesn’t recognize this originality), we can try to combine the AI work with other protected works. Taking the ruling of the U.S. Copyright Office as an example, aside from the controversy over the copyright of AI works, the Copyright Office has given a realistic solution to the problem that AI paintings are not protected by law-combining with other protected works. For example, comic books involved in the case, although the pictures are not protected by copyright law, the written works (story content) embedded in the pictures belong to works in the sense of copyright law, and both of them can be protected in the form of compiled works, and the author still enjoys the rights to the works.

Some anti-AI groups think that the ruling of the US Copyright Office denies the copyright of AI paintings, but is this really the case?

At the end of the letter, the US Copyright Office specially emphasized that they did not completely rule out the possibility of accepting the copyright registration of AI painting, but only decided that the author’s influence on the image in this case did not reflect enough creativity. In other words, the ruling of the Copyright Administration is only the first time to demarcate the judging boundary of whether AI works are copyrightable at the official level, that is, human originality.

With the change of AI painting technology, it has become a "past tense" for Kristina Kashtanova to rely solely on text information to generate works. Nowadays, many AI painting lovers will build their own models and use the database to train AI, such as various Lora models that are now self-trained on Stable Diffusion. This kind of behavior seems to greatly satisfy the copyright condition of "originality", but it also brings about cliche problems.Does using AI constitute plagiarism? Will it constitute infringement?

Lawyer Xiao Sa gave a detailed explanation: "Whether AI painting infringes is a very complicated issue. In judicial practice, Chinese courts generally follow the standard of "contact+substantial similarity" to judge whether a work is plagiarized, that is, two conditions need to be met: (1) the author of the later work has "contacted" the former work (it is only necessary to prove that it is "likely to contact", for example, the former work has been published by the author on the Internet); (2) The composition of the post-work and the pre-work is substantially similar (abstract observation and overall observation are used for comprehensive judgment on substantive similarity).

We believe that AI works are difficult to be identified as "plagiarized" works under this judgment rule. On the one hand, it is impossible to prove that AI tools have "touched" infringed works by proving that the works have been published in public, as human works do, because AI painting tools are a product based on the combination of massive original data and specific algorithms, and only when the massive original pictures used by AI painting tools to train large models contain "infringed" works can they be "touched"; On the other hand, AI works are very random. Although there may be similarities in painting style and theme with other works, this similarity belongs to the similarity in thought rather than the similarity in expression protected by copyright. Therefore, it is difficult to prove that there is a "substantial similarity" between the two works, whether it is abstracting its single element and comparing them with the infringed works or comparing them from the overall impression.

Lawyer Xiao Sa believes that high probability does not constitute infringement. Generally speaking, AI creation does not infringe the rights of works and authors. As mentioned above, the object protected by the copyright system itself is the expression of original ideas. In other words, it focuses on the expression rather than the thought itself, and the thought, as a subjective thing that has not actually happened, is not within the protection scope of the copyright system. Only this kind of thought exists objectively as an expression and is original can it exist as the object of copyright protection. Therefore, in the field of copyright law, expressions cannot be copied, but ideas can be used for reference. Painting style and subject belong to "thought" rather than "expression". In this sense, the imitation of painting style belongs to the reference of thought rather than plagiarism, so it certainly does not involve the infringement of copyright. For example, birds are also sketched. A picture of a flying bird created by Xiao Zhang is of course different from a picture of a bird perched in a tree created by Xiao Li. Both of them are also within the scope of the works, but there is no infringement relationship between them.

Whenever new technologies and tools appear, they are bound to be questioned. In the future, we may still need to conduct more in-depth legal and ethical research and discussion on the copyright ownership of AI’s creative works. But we have to admit that the trend is irresistible, and it is almost impossible to get the upper hand against a technology with great commercial prospects and practical application that can significantly improve production efficiency.

It is worth noting that in the publicity of the rule of law in Weibo, the official city of the Supreme People’s Procuratorate, China, pictures generated by AI painting tools have been used.